From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8458 invoked by uid 1002); 1 Aug 2003 10:47:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10342 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2003 10:47:34 -0000 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 06:52:33 -0400 From: Michael Cummings To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030801105233.GF1256@enki.datanode.net> Reply-To: mcummings@gentoo.org Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <3F27E21D.5010000@codewordt.co.uk> <200307301839.24988.vapier@gentoo.org> <3F2A1E0E.4050303@codewordt.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F2A1E0E.4050303@codewordt.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails X-Archives-Salt: 874abded-c7f0-4c7d-b0d6-343708f10647 X-Archives-Hash: 3d5bbcadb9bcf5edeb728ddcba9c9936 As the one that got it working, I'm biased... I'd say no to that (unless outvoted of course) on the grounds that a manifest change *is* worthy of note. It means that the checksum has changed on one of the files listed. On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Thanks. It seems to be working now. > > Would it be possible to omit entries that mention only a manifest > fixing? It's just that there's so many of them everytime (done by > scripts I presume) the email becomes really long. > > With regards. > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > -- -----o()o--------------------------------------------- | http://www.gentoo.org/ | #gentoo-dev on irc.freenode.net Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net Perl Guy | | GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E -----o()o--------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list