From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10763 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Jul 2003 12:39:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25454 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2003 12:39:52 -0000 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 08:37:21 -0400 From: Kurt Lieber To: bdharring Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030726123717.GY9959@mail.lieber.org> References: <20030725141108.GI9959@mail.lieber.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nvGWocd+jzj7I/La" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: re-organizing our source mirrors into two categories: full and partial X-Archives-Salt: 0c1f7e92-bfe3-45e1-bfe2-532c82a6990b X-Archives-Hash: 8044a4be9f77c6bf101056bdb0755cf3 --nvGWocd+jzj7I/La Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:33:07AM -0500 or thereabouts, bdharring wrote: > Also, are you advocating the distfile mirrors carry a *complete*=20 > distfile mirror, or a partial? I'm curious what the space savings=20 > would be... Distfile mirrors would be required to carry the full /distfiles directory. --kurt --nvGWocd+jzj7I/La Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/InX9JPpRNiftIEYRAiomAJ9LN7TNKV9FaKfAnhAMCDg52kOl+ACdEpc4 4CIl39uu86+dOahXVzAWPVc= =coaU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nvGWocd+jzj7I/La--