public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@gentoo.org>
To: Adrian Almenar <strider@gentoo.org>
Cc: Owen Gunden <ogunden@stwing.upenn.edu>, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex-cvs being removed from portage?
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 00:20:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307260020.14612.luke-jr@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F213F29.3080103@gentoo.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, however, I believe WINE used a different license (BSD perhaps) at one 
point and changed to LGPL later. It it likely that WineX was forked from the 
earlier version.

On Friday 25 July 2003 02:31 pm, Adrian Almenar wrote:
> Winex is derived from wine and wine is NOT GPL is LGPL, AFAIK.
>
> Luke-Jr wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think WineX is licensed under the GPL.
> > Also, the GPL only requires that they give you the source with the
> > binary. As long as the subscribers can get the source with the binary,
> > nothing would stop them from denying the public access to it.
> >
> >On Friday 25 July 2003 03:47 am, Owen Gunden wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:01:37PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >>>How about because they asked us to?  Essentially, we have been asked to
> >>>not create an automated process to allow a user to install winex from
> >>>cvs.  The anonymous cvs is there for people to assist in development
> >>>with winex.  Technically, there is nothing stopping us from continuing
> >>>to provide winex-cvs ebuilds.  However, Gentoo is part of a larger
> >>>community and quite simply, you don't maintain your status as a useful
> >>>member of the community if you go around pissing off your neighbors.  In
> >>>fact, there is nothing keeping Transgaming from pulling the anonymous
> >>>cvs access for the winex sources from sourceforge and making it
> >>>available to subscriber's only.
> >>
> >>Then why is the anonymous cvs access available in the first place?  Also,
> >>are you sure they don't have to release the source because of the GPL?
> >>IANAL, and I certainly don't know what I'm talking about.  Just
> >> wondering.
> >>
> >>Owen
> >>
> >>--
> >>gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >- --
> >Luke-Jr
> >Developer, Gentoo Linux
> >http://www.gentoo.org/
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> >iD8DBQE/ILOiZl/BHdU+lYMRAvwnAJ0ft8tV4scOUrRsLikg/K1bN49yGgCgj5fn
> >C2eS/837fRlpQ4EmPl7v0Pg=
> >=e47W
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> >--
> >gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

- -- 
Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Ick9Zl/BHdU+lYMRAuHCAJ975znnsj45xXIKHJXe3YEJbO3fZQCdF9lh
Xw89+jJf4v2WFR0LkfNGMSY=
=4m/s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-26  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-23  5:08 [gentoo-dev] Winex-cvs being removed from portage? dean .
2003-07-23  5:42 ` Seemant Kulleen
2003-07-25  1:01   ` Andrew Cowie
2003-07-25  1:42     ` Brett I. Holcomb
2003-07-25  1:45       ` Nick Hadaway
2003-07-25  2:01       ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-07-25  3:47         ` Owen Gunden
2003-07-25  4:14           ` Mike Frysinger
2003-07-25  4:35           ` Luke-Jr
2003-07-25 14:31             ` Adrian Almenar
2003-07-26  0:20               ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2003-07-26 13:34                 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-07-25  6:13           ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-07-25  9:49             ` Patrick Lauer
2003-07-25 10:00               ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-07-25 11:54               ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-07-25 12:26                 ` Patrick Lauer
2003-07-25 13:17                   ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-07-25 14:06                 ` Dan Armak
2003-07-25 10:53             ` Svyatogor
2003-07-25 11:38           ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-07-25 14:08         ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200307260020.14612.luke-jr@gentoo.org \
    --to=luke-jr@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=ogunden@stwing.upenn.edu \
    --cc=strider@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox