From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5903 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Jul 2003 14:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26708 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2003 14:08:37 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:08:34 +0200 From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030725160834.62e6617d.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> In-Reply-To: <1059098497.23507.6.camel@vertigo> References: <20030722224244.5c16c414.seemant@gentoo.org> <1059094909.2408.35.camel@localhost> <1059098497.23507.6.camel@vertigo> Organization: Fasmz X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex-cvs being removed from portage? X-Archives-Salt: 9bde3ac5-2f7d-4ca0-9b5e-05a324dd48fb X-Archives-Hash: 6279c21a7f9e5abc9f9b0afa446be099 On 24 Jul 2003 22:01:37 -0400 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Here's a basic summary from the way I see it from watching the > discussion. > > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 21:42, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: > > If there are other reasons can we know them and maybe > > comment on them, too? > > How about because they asked us to? And we are not the first ones. It reminds a similar case for Debian: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200205/msg02463.html which has brought to this conclusion: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200205/msg02823.html I've thought it was some interesting reading about this subject. -- TGL. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list