From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15774 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Jul 2003 11:38:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17336 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2003 11:38:38 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:38:33 -0400 From: Weeve To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030725073833.141e5f0d.weeve@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200307251108.44661.lanius@gentoo.org> References: <200307251108.44661.lanius@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.12,YPJdBiVoMDg" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps X-Archives-Salt: 8c6fa089-5ece-4784-b941-6bb77403334d X-Archives-Hash: 374138974fbddd20289d64a5e87bd2c0 --=.12,YPJdBiVoMDg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:08:44 +0200 Heinrich Wendel wrote: > Hi, > > I want to mark the following packages stable, but they still need testing on > non-x86 arches: > (snip) > cups-1.1.19-r1 Can we hold off on stabilizing this until bug #24759 is resolved? I don't believe it impairs functionality (other than keeping a good eye on startup scripts at boot time) but cups never used to do this. Thanks, -- Weeve Gentoo/Sparc Team Lead --=.12,YPJdBiVoMDg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/IRa6dKvgdVioq28RAo0IAJ4qpNO87EM6hx9hlfpRQKEVQh5t3gCfehB5 lZyL/X+nST/bJbRHwq7Mk2c= =+21B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.12,YPJdBiVoMDg--