[gentoo-dev] Calling all architectures: Mozilla 1.0?

[gentoo-dev] Calling all architectures: Mozilla 1.0?

[Brad Laue]

Greetings all,

I'd like to inquire of the architecture teams other than x86 as to the 
status of Mozilla on those systems. Please let the mozilla team know if 
your architecture still requires Mozilla 1.0.1 to be in the tree, either 
as a dependency or the only currently stable version.

Thanks!
Brad


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling all architectures: Mozilla 1.0?

[Luke-Jr]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Seeing as Mozilla 1.0.1 is *still* the most stable version (never seen a 1.0 
crash), I would hope it would still be available in Portage for a while...

On Thursday 24 July 2003 05:41 pm, Brad Laue wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I'd like to inquire of the architecture teams other than x86 as to the
> status of Mozilla on those systems. Please let the mozilla team know if
> your architecture still requires Mozilla 1.0.1 to be in the tree, either
> as a dependency or the only currently stable version.
>
> Thanks!
> Brad
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

- -- 
Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/IIkvZl/BHdU+lYMRAtARAJsGcuPxxB7Jm259jY/owxyF71Y1XQCghAdX
Nk0BTcz0H/SvJtDja+ILgcY=
=iXtM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling all architectures: Mozilla 1.0?

[Owen Gunden]

On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> Seeing as Mozilla 1.0.1 is *still* the most stable version (never seen a 1.0 
> crash), I would hope it would still be available in Portage for a while...

Do you have any data to back this up?  Because that's not been my
experience at all.   

Owen

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling all architectures: Mozilla 1.0?

[Luke-Jr]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Not any actual test data, no, but from experience that seems to be the case. 
Also, until recently, Mozilla.org had been recommending new users 1.0 because 
of stability.
Is there any reason *not* to have it in Portage?


On Friday 25 July 2003 03:59 am, Owen Gunden wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > Seeing as Mozilla 1.0.1 is *still* the most stable version (never seen a
> > 1.0 crash), I would hope it would still be available in Portage for a
> > while...
>
> Do you have any data to back this up?  Because that's not been my
> experience at all.
>
> Owen
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

- -- 
Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ILLqZl/BHdU+lYMRAnpbAJ48gZWwIiipjSbv2q+JkDMkeVzPdwCfWPrb
MiCRnmdqOfVMKcShLM/J1L8=
=Wcr3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list