From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15023 invoked by uid 1002); 23 Jul 2003 21:04:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4128 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2003 21:04:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:01:41 -0400 From: Kurt Lieber To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030723210138.GO9959@mail.lieber.org> References: <20030723194823.GJ9959@mail.lieber.org> <20030723084039.GQ19204@fuerzag.ulatina.ac.cr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VB1oQhYtJt8uuzk+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030723084039.GQ19204@fuerzag.ulatina.ac.cr> X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The release of 1.4 and its impact on our mirrors X-Archives-Salt: 7ecd649a-bc1b-4f8a-a040-d479a60408d7 X-Archives-Hash: 9893854bc98ce9896c75984b0d0ce344 --VB1oQhYtJt8uuzk+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:40:39PM +0600 or thereabouts, Alvaro Figueroa Cabezas wrote: > Using jigdo instead of distributing the ISOs. I like the idea of jigdo and think it's a great idea for saving bandwidth, but I don't necessarily see how this will save disk space, which is our primary issue right now. Take GRP stuff, for instance -- we're releasing multiple sets, optimized for each architecture. So the binary for KDE on P4 is not the same as the binary for KDE on Athlon XP -- two separate copies need to exist. --kurt --VB1oQhYtJt8uuzk+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/HvexJPpRNiftIEYRAleZAKCPB9G9Iu+k6a6esBEu2ASvcGu8bACfVoYE 4ptNlFR01jiG3sFwpSLcCIo= =0B93 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VB1oQhYtJt8uuzk+--