From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5776 invoked by uid 1002); 23 Jul 2003 19:39:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10449 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2003 19:39:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:39:17 -0400 From: Matt Rickard To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030723153917.48d303a1.frogger@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200307231246.08362.pfeifer@gentoo.org> References: <20030723121603.11ab807e.frogger@gentoo.org> <200307231246.08362.pfeifer@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Where to put prerelease vanilla kernels? X-Archives-Salt: 90cdd946-e6b5-4811-9bc5-6a412e66191f X-Archives-Hash: 3c9b95c89819f6d8cca013784dbb3ac1 On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:45:55 -0500 Jay Pfeifer wrote: > > My thoughts... also posted on bug 25107... > > best just to put a pkg_postinst warning similar to the one from > http://www.kernel.org/prepatch.html. I think this is better than > putting the ebuilds in the package.mask. I would also want the package > to be 'sys-kernel/vanilla-prepatch-sources' or > 'sys-kernel/prepatch-sources'. Probably the first. This would keep > users wanting the latest stable version, as deemed by kernel.org, from > accidentally emerging the wrong vanilla-sources. > I put it in 'sys-kernel/vanilla-prepatch-sources' and added a pkg_postinst warning. Just committed it and closed bug 25107. -- Matt Rickard frogger@gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list