From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29226 invoked by uid 1002); 23 Jul 2003 18:24:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14732 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2003 18:24:48 -0000 From: Jay Pfeifer To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:24:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <20030723121603.11ab807e.frogger@gentoo.org> <3F1ECEAC.1000904@codewordt.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3F1ECEAC.1000904@codewordt.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307231324.39202.pfeifer@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (----) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *19fOIA-00035G-00*7uFf82mCJ.w* Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Where to put prerelease vanilla kernels? X-Archives-Salt: 7570678a-895f-4f23-bd87-8b888b53a02b X-Archives-Hash: c7aa08a97703a9e6909a02c47be13385 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 See below. On Wednesday 23 July 2003 01:06 pm, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: > > How about splitting development-sources into 2.6.x and 2.4.x trees? > It's not like 2.6.x is the only branch undergoing 'development'. the 2.5/2.6.x is a beta patch, not a prepatch for now. It goes under=20 sys-kernel/development-sources. Until there is a 2.6.0 release and subseque= nt=20 prepatches against 2.6.0 as a 2.6.1preX - @ that time it would go into the= =20 proposed sys-kernel/vanilla-prepatch-sources. Jay =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/HtLde5xY3v0FhjgRAnKQAJ9UMeJlqN8BBcSaKVnV6iFIJPukJwCeNESt Rt4qWoLrHyj5XIN9KwmGTBw=3D =3DEpLP =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list