From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-4870-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 1725 invoked by uid 1002); 23 Jul 2003 05:43:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 24725 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2003 05:43:19 -0000
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:42:44 -0700
From: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Message-Id: <20030722224244.5c16c414.seemant@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <BAY7-F605euwdUTaGmv0000fd76@hotmail.com>
References: <BAY7-F605euwdUTaGmv0000fd76@hotmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.pW9rr0KCcSJjST"
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex-cvs being removed from portage?
X-Archives-Salt: 400c6402-4f3f-4525-8dcd-5b78d2a46f05
X-Archives-Hash: baf63e1bc869a6f1ea64542fe659e3a1

--=.pW9rr0KCcSJjST
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> is this right?

It's a strong possibility.  It's under discussion.

-- 
Seemant Kulleen
Developer and Project Co-ordinator,
Gentoo Linux					http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant

Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E
Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E

--=.pW9rr0KCcSJjST
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/HiBU7aJl2DRYeA4RAoXHAJ9GxmEixHee8i302oiKBlCOc1hCFwCgotyc
EugI36tMAM7sGC+dCAWkUi4=
=3BSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=.pW9rr0KCcSJjST--