From: "gentoo@codewordt.co.uk" <gentoo@codewordt.co.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Cc: dhruba@codewordt.co.uk
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Local/per-package use flags absent from UFED
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 21:43:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030722204327.GA13816@feathers.codewordt.co.uk> (raw)
Hello
Recently, I've found that certain packages are using use flags specific to that package only but absent from ufed. Take ntp for example:
$ emerge ntp -vp
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild N ] net-misc/ntp-4.1.1b-r6 -parse-clocks
The '-parse-clocks' use flag was not present in ufed. I have several more examples that I cannot remember at this time.
This causes the following problems.
* The user is unable to find out the description of the use flag.
* The user may overlook flags not present in ufed resulting in incorrect configuration.
* If this problem is valid then it points towards a problem with ufed.
* Bearing the recent phenomenal explosion in use flags having these extra flags flying around only serves to inflame the problem or information overload.
- Are these per-package use flags which are distinctly different from local use flags?
- If so, is ufed in its current state unable to deal with such flags?
- Is ufed due to undergo any further development to take account of ncurses and per package use flags or is it going to remain static?
I would also like to raise certain fundamental issues about use flags in general but I'll leave that for another thread at another time.
Many thanks.
Dhruba Bandopadhyay.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-22 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-22 20:43 gentoo [this message]
2003-07-22 20:54 ` [gentoo-dev] Local/per-package use flags absent from UFED Fred Van Andel
2003-07-22 21:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030722204327.GA13816@feathers.codewordt.co.uk \
--to=gentoo@codewordt.co.uk \
--cc=dhruba@codewordt.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox