[gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Brett I. Holcomb]

I did an emerge -u --deep world -p and am told that winex -cvs and 
glibc-2.3.2-r1 conflict with each other.    I get

B app-emulation/winex-cvs (from pkg sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1)
R sys-libs.glibc-2.3.2-r1

I remember some heavy discussion on glibc being upgraded (one says it breaks 
x but another says x works fine, etc.) but from what I remember it was 
decided to do it anyway. 

How do I fix this?  It appears I'm blocked.  I didn't see anything on 
bugzilla that would apply to this.

Thanks.

-- 

Brett I. Holcomb
AKA Grunt <><

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Peter Ruskin]

On Tuesday 22 Jul 2003 00:20, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> I did an emerge -u --deep world -p and am told that winex -cvs and
> glibc-2.3.2-r1 conflict with each other.    I get
>
> B app-emulation/winex-cvs (from pkg sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1)
> R sys-libs.glibc-2.3.2-r1
>
> I remember some heavy discussion on glibc being upgraded (one says it
> breaks x but another says x works fine, etc.) but from what I
> remember it was decided to do it anyway.
>
> How do I fix this?  It appears I'm blocked.  I didn't see anything on
> bugzilla that would apply to this.
>
Hi Brett,

I was one making noise about winex not working with glibc-2.3.2.  I 
added this line to /etc/portage/package.mask:
	>=sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1
before upgrading.  This kept glibc-2.3.2-r1 on my box so winex still 
works for me.

Everything OK so far.

Peter
-- 
==================================================
Gentoo Linux:	Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.7
kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+
==================================================


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Brett I. Holcomb]

Nope, didn't work.  If I do  an emerge -u --deep system -p it wants to 
downgrade/upgrade glibc-2.3.1-r4 from 2.3.2-r1.  I'm still blocked.

I'm running glibc-2.3.2-r1.

Any ideas on how to fix this?  I'll bug it too.

Looks like you were right!
> On Tuesday 22 Jul 2003 00:20, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> > I did an emerge -u --deep world -p and am told that winex -cvs and
> > glibc-2.3.2-r1 conflict with each other.    I get
> >
> > B app-emulation/winex-cvs (from pkg sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1)
> > R sys-libs.glibc-2.3.2-r1
> >
> > I remember some heavy discussion on glibc being upgraded (one says it
> > breaks x but another says x works fine, etc.) but from what I
> > remember it was decided to do it anyway.
> >
> > How do I fix this?  It appears I'm blocked.  I didn't see anything on
> > bugzilla that would apply to this.
>
> Hi Brett,
>
> I was one making noise about winex not working with glibc-2.3.2.  I
>
> added this line to /etc/portage/package.mask:
> 	>=sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1
>
> before upgrading.  This kept glibc-2.3.2-r1 on my box so winex still
> works for me.
>
> Everything OK so far.
>
> Peter

-- 

Brett I. Holcomb
AKA Grunt <><

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Mike Frysinger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

if you're already using glibc-2.3.2 then winex hasnt been working for you ...
`emerge -C winex` and wait until they release a newer version that works with 
glibc-2.3.2
- -mike

On Monday 21 July 2003 20:18, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> Nope, didn't work.  If I do  an emerge -u --deep system -p it wants to
> downgrade/upgrade glibc-2.3.1-r4 from 2.3.2-r1.  I'm still blocked.
>
> I'm running glibc-2.3.2-r1.
>
> Any ideas on how to fix this?  I'll bug it too.
>
> Looks like you were right!
>
> > On Tuesday 22 Jul 2003 00:20, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> > > I did an emerge -u --deep world -p and am told that winex -cvs and
> > > glibc-2.3.2-r1 conflict with each other.    I get
> > >
> > > B app-emulation/winex-cvs (from pkg sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1)
> > > R sys-libs.glibc-2.3.2-r1
> > >
> > > I remember some heavy discussion on glibc being upgraded (one says it
> > > breaks x but another says x works fine, etc.) but from what I
> > > remember it was decided to do it anyway.
> > >
> > > How do I fix this?  It appears I'm blocked.  I didn't see anything on
> > > bugzilla that would apply to this.
> >
> > Hi Brett,
> >
> > I was one making noise about winex not working with glibc-2.3.2.  I
> >
> > added this line to /etc/portage/package.mask:
> > 	>=sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1
> >
> > before upgrading.  This kept glibc-2.3.2-r1 on my box so winex still
> > works for me.
> >
> > Everything OK so far.
> >
> > Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
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=wFwi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Mike Frysinger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

i wouldnt suggest trying to downgrade ... i'm pretty sure it'll leave your box 
usuable (well it'll leave glibc unusable and thats usually your whole box :D)

you can (if you dont mind shelling out $5) buy the binary versions from 
transgaming ... those work with the newest glibc ...
- -mike

On Monday 21 July 2003 22:35, you wrote:
> Winex was working but I haven't tried it since the glibc update.  I only
> run one game under it and haven't had time to try it.
>
> Anyway to get back to the previous version of glibc - what does that entail
> - merge the previous, unmerge 2.3.2?  Who knows when they'll update winex.
>
> > if you're already using glibc-2.3.2 then winex hasnt been working for you
> > ... `emerge -C winex` and wait until they release a newer version that
> > works with glibc-2.3.2
> > -mike
> >
> > On Monday 21 July 2003 20:18, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> > > Nope, didn't work.  If I do  an emerge -u --deep system -p it wants to
> > > downgrade/upgrade glibc-2.3.1-r4 from 2.3.2-r1.  I'm still blocked.
> > >
> > > I'm running glibc-2.3.2-r1.
> > >
> > > Any ideas on how to fix this?  I'll bug it too.
> > >
> > > Looks like you were right!
> > >
> > > > On Tuesday 22 Jul 2003 00:20, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> > > > > I did an emerge -u --deep world -p and am told that winex -cvs and
> > > > > glibc-2.3.2-r1 conflict with each other.    I get
> > > > >
> > > > > B app-emulation/winex-cvs (from pkg sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1)
> > > > > R sys-libs.glibc-2.3.2-r1
> > > > >
> > > > > I remember some heavy discussion on glibc being upgraded (one says
> > > > > it breaks x but another says x works fine, etc.) but from what I
> > > > > remember it was decided to do it anyway.
> > > > >
> > > > > How do I fix this?  It appears I'm blocked.  I didn't see anything
> > > > > on bugzilla that would apply to this.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Brett,
> > > >
> > > > I was one making noise about winex not working with glibc-2.3.2.  I
> > > >
> > > > added this line to /etc/portage/package.mask:
> > > > 	>=sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1
> > > >
> > > > before upgrading.  This kept glibc-2.3.2-r1 on my box so winex still
> > > > works for me.
> > > >
> > > > Everything OK so far.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
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=uB2e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Tony Clark]

On Tuesday 22 July 2003 04.35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> i wouldnt suggest trying to downgrade ... i'm pretty sure it'll leave your
> box usuable (well it'll leave glibc unusable and thats usually your whole
> box :D)
>
> you can (if you dont mind shelling out $5) buy the binary versions from
> transgaming ... those work with the newest glibc ...
> - -mike
>
Don't buy codeweavers wine stuff as it doesn't work with the latest version of 
glibc.  I'll be downgrading glibc soon. Built glibc with nptl support as 
someone here said it would work that way but it doesn't here.  There is also 
a bug in the glibc ebuild when you enable nptl, which I must report.

tony

-- 
Contract ASIC and FPGA design.
Telephone +46 702 894 667
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x633E2623



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Jon Portnoy]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:17:40AM +0200, Tony Clark wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 04.35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > i wouldnt suggest trying to downgrade ... i'm pretty sure it'll leave your
> > box usuable (well it'll leave glibc unusable and thats usually your whole
> > box :D)
> >
> > you can (if you dont mind shelling out $5) buy the binary versions from
> > transgaming ... those work with the newest glibc ...
> > - -mike
> >
> Don't buy codeweavers wine stuff as it doesn't work with the latest version of 
> glibc.  I'll be downgrading glibc soon. Built glibc with nptl support as 
> someone here said it would work that way but it doesn't here.  There is also 
> a bug in the glibc ebuild when you enable nptl, which I must report.
> 
> tony
> 

Downgrading glibc is a bad idea... anything built against the newer 
glibc version will break...

-- 
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Peter Ruskin]

On Tuesday 22 Jul 2003 01:18, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> Nope, didn't work.  If I do  an emerge -u --deep system -p it wants
> to downgrade/upgrade glibc-2.3.1-r4 from 2.3.2-r1.  I'm still
> blocked.
>
> I'm running glibc-2.3.2-r1.

# cat /etc/portage/package.mask | grep glibc
# glibc-2.3.2 stops winex working ... Peter Ruskin 22-Jun-03
>=sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1

# etcat -v glibc
[ Results for search key : glibc ]
[ Applications found : 2 ]

*  app-doc/ebook-glibc :
        [   ] app-doc/ebook-glibc-2.2.4 (0)

*  sys-libs/glibc :
        [   ] sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r8 (2.2)
        [  I] sys-libs/glibc-2.3.1-r4 (2.2)
        [M  ] sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r1 (2.2)
        [M  ] sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r2 (2.2)

# emerge -u --deep system -p

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating system dependencies ...done!

I don't understand why that doesn't work for you.

Peter
-- 
==================================================
Gentoo Linux:	Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.7
kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+
==================================================


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Mike Wojcikiewicz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 22 July 2003 01:24, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:17:40AM +0200, Tony Clark wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 04.35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > i wouldnt suggest trying to downgrade ... i'm pretty sure it'll leave
> > > your box usuable (well it'll leave glibc unusable and thats usually
> > > your whole box :D)
> > >
> > > you can (if you dont mind shelling out $5) buy the binary versions from
> > > transgaming ... those work with the newest glibc ...
> > > - -mike
> >
> > Don't buy codeweavers wine stuff as it doesn't work with the latest
> > version of glibc.  I'll be downgrading glibc soon. Built glibc with nptl
> > support as someone here said it would work that way but it doesn't here. 
> > There is also a bug in the glibc ebuild when you enable nptl, which I
> > must report.
> >
> > tony
>
> Downgrading glibc is a bad idea... anything built against the newer
> glibc version will break...

Hmmm I'm running gcc 3.2.3 and glibc 2.3.2 and codeweavers crossover plugin 
works fine for me.. of course I had to tweak ~/.crossover/config to contain 
my latest kernel (2.4.22) in LDAssumeKernel, but after that everything worked 
flawlessly

- --mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/HTpOzK7WDkEewTARAuhrAKCAOEuVafB/m6tJStSW6Vr92iXw8QCfaVPf
72FdiIZdDoF25Ga3nuvFwQY=
=DdjP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Tony Clark]

On Tuesday 22 July 2003 15.21, Mike Wojcikiewicz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 01:24, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:17:40AM +0200, Tony Clark wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 04.35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > > i wouldnt suggest trying to downgrade ... i'm pretty sure it'll leave
> > > > your box usuable (well it'll leave glibc unusable and thats usually
> > > > your whole box :D)
> > > >
> > > > you can (if you dont mind shelling out $5) buy the binary versions
> > > > from transgaming ... those work with the newest glibc ...
> > > > - -mike
> > >
> > > Don't buy codeweavers wine stuff as it doesn't work with the latest
> > > version of glibc.  I'll be downgrading glibc soon. Built glibc with
> > > nptl support as someone here said it would work that way but it doesn't
> > > here. There is also a bug in the glibc ebuild when you enable nptl,
> > > which I must report.
> > >
> > > tony
> >
> > Downgrading glibc is a bad idea... anything built against the newer
> > glibc version will break...
>
> Hmmm I'm running gcc 3.2.3 and glibc 2.3.2 and codeweavers crossover plugin
> works fine for me.. of course I had to tweak ~/.crossover/config to contain
> my latest kernel (2.4.22) in LDAssumeKernel, but after that everything
> worked flawlessly
Actually I was talking crossover office not plugin, haven't tried that.  Guess 
I should have been more specific.

tony

-- 
Contract ASIC and FPGA design.
Telephone +46 702 894 667
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x633E2623



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Tony Clark]

On Tuesday 22 July 2003 07.24, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:17:40AM +0200, Tony Clark wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 04.35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > i wouldnt suggest trying to downgrade ... i'm pretty sure it'll leave
> > > your box usuable (well it'll leave glibc unusable and thats usually
> > > your whole box :D)
> > >
> > > you can (if you dont mind shelling out $5) buy the binary versions from
> > > transgaming ... those work with the newest glibc ...
> > > - -mike
> >
> > Don't buy codeweavers wine stuff as it doesn't work with the latest
> > version of glibc.  I'll be downgrading glibc soon. Built glibc with nptl
> > support as someone here said it would work that way but it doesn't here. 
> > There is also a bug in the glibc ebuild when you enable nptl, which I
> > must report.
> >
> > tony
>
> Downgrading glibc is a bad idea... anything built against the newer
> glibc version will break...
Yeah, been there done that :)  In this case there are only a couple of things 
built against the latest glibc and they can fail at this stage.

tony
-- 
Contract ASIC and FPGA design.
Telephone +46 702 894 667
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x633E2623



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[James H. Cloos Jr.]

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> writes:

Peter> # cat /etc/portage/package.mask | grep glibc # glibc-2.3.2

In my experience, /etc/portage/package.mask is ignored, unlike
/etc/portage/package.unmask.

The OP is probably having the same problem.

(I had just guessed, when .unmask was added, that .mask
would also work.  But my experimentation proved otherwise.)

So why does it *work* for you? :)

-JimC


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Peter Ruskin]

On Tuesday 22 Jul 2003 23:53, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:
> >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> writes:
>
> Peter> # cat /etc/portage/package.mask | grep glibc # glibc-2.3.2
>
> In my experience, /etc/portage/package.mask is ignored, unlike
> /etc/portage/package.unmask.
>
> The OP is probably having the same problem.
>
> (I had just guessed, when .unmask was added, that .mask
> would also work.  But my experimentation proved otherwise.)
>
> So why does it *work* for you? :)
>
> -JimC

It does work.  When it was first introduced it was 
/etc/portage/profiles/package.mask for some reason.  Now it's 
/etc/portage/package.mask.

Perhaps yours is still in the old location?  Otherwise I can't see why 
it works for me and not for you.  I don't think there's anything 
special about my box.

Peter
-- 
==================================================
Gentoo Linux:	Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.7
kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+
==================================================


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[Thomas de Grenier de Latour]

On 22 Jul 2003 18:53:33 -0400
"James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos@jhcloos.com> wrote:

> So why does it *work* for you? :)

Location of this file depends on portage version. 

# grep "pkgmasklines+=" /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py
pkgmasklines+=grabfile("/etc/portage/package.mask")

(This is for portage-2.0.49_pre12, but it used to be
"/etc/portage/profiles/package.mask".)

-- 
TGL.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc

[James H. Cloos Jr.]

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> writes:

Peter> It does work.  When it was first introduced it was 
Peter> /etc/portage/profiles/package.mask for some reason. 
Peter>  Now it's /etc/portage/package.mask.

Peter> Perhaps yours is still in the old location?

I had never tried /etc/portage/profiles.  Never occured to me.

So perhaps it works now for me...

(testing...)

Ah, yes.  It does work now.

Cool.

-JimC


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list