* [gentoo-dev] Perl-5.8 and "default-1.0" profile
@ 2003-07-19 16:13 Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2003-07-19 21:23 ` Michael Cummings
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour @ 2003-07-19 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hi,
I've seen that perl-5.8 is now unmasked in default-1.0/packages. Before
I do the update, I would like to be sure it's a safe and intentional
change (please forgive my skepticism, but it has been -5.6 for such a
long time...). Can somebody confirm this please?
Thanks a lot,
--
TGL.
PS: it would be really handy to have some profile ChangeLogs :)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Perl-5.8 and "default-1.0" profile
2003-07-19 16:13 [gentoo-dev] Perl-5.8 and "default-1.0" profile Thomas de Grenier de Latour
@ 2003-07-19 21:23 ` Michael Cummings
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Cummings @ 2003-07-19 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Thomas de Grenier de Latour; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2256 bytes --]
I cannot speak as to why it was released for default-1.0 at this time (I actually don't know), but I can address your concerns. Perl-5.8 is stable and has been for some time; it has been a part of the 1.4 profile since Dec/Jan. I'd advise that when you finish the perl upgrade, you try out the libperl-rebuilder script located in dev-lang/perl/files/ (it's mentioned in the einfo at the end of the perl upgrade, but is often missed during a batch upgrade). libperl-rebuilder *attempts* to address the upgrade by re-building anything that was compiled against your old libperl.so (the new libperl.so is incompatible with the 5.6.1 version). It also attempts 3 times to re-emerge your perl modules. Why 3 times? Well, there doesn't exist yet in portage the ability to simple re-emerge anything affected by an upgrade. The three times is an attempt to get at all of the perl modules that you have installed that relied on the old libperl.a/so - three times being a safe number of sub-dependencies that should catch almost everything. That is, after the third sweep, there shouldn't be anything left that depends on anything that hasn't been re-emerged yet. libperl-rebuilder isn't perfect, as we've seen via bugzilla, but for most it does a fair job. As always, please post problems to bugs.gentoo.org care of perl@gentoo.org where rac and I watch for problems. Thanks and I hope this helps,
Mike
--
-----o()o---------------------------------------------
| http://www.gentoo.org/
| #gentoo-dev on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net
Perl Guy |
| GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
-----o()o---------------------------------------------
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:13:19 +0200
Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@easyconnect.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that perl-5.8 is now unmasked in default-1.0/packages. Before
> I do the update, I would like to be sure it's a safe and intentional
> change (please forgive my skepticism, but it has been -5.6 for such a
> long time...). Can somebody confirm this please?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> --
> TGL.
>
> PS: it would be really handy to have some profile ChangeLogs :)
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-19 21:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-19 16:13 [gentoo-dev] Perl-5.8 and "default-1.0" profile Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2003-07-19 21:23 ` Michael Cummings
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox