From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11527 invoked by uid 1002); 15 Jul 2003 20:27:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 1231 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2003 20:27:57 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:27:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200307151319.13920.pauldv@gentoo.org> <03d901c34ac5$d249a3c0$c200a8c0@Churchill> <20030715180809.GB14630@cerberus.oppresses.us> In-Reply-To: <20030715180809.GB14630@cerberus.oppresses.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_HPGF/Ji4a2jhlRJ"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200307152227.52032.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo part II. X-Archives-Salt: d972a4ec-4ce3-4979-a54f-471bb648e795 X-Archives-Hash: 0c0d44a0f1cac09aae61a65ff78307bf --Boundary-02=_HPGF/Ji4a2jhlRJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 15 July 2003 20:08, Jon Portnoy wrote: > > > Be assured that these issues are being addressed. This > > > requires time though, as restructuring is necessary for it to happen. > > > > You talk like we should run along and play, and not bother BigPeople(tm) > > like yourself. You'll have to excuse me if I don't like that ;-) It's > > exactly this sort of *presentation* (I use the work presentation because > > you've included nothing of substance in your reply!) that makes people > > call for more openness in the community. Interesting. > > I don't think that was Paul's intention. Additionally, we're not hiding > anything; proposals are on the web in the form of GLEPs AFAIK. However, > we're still hashing out what we want to do for various things. Just so you all know, Stuart and I had an off-list discussion about this to= pic=20 clarifying things up. I think I can say that there are no bad feelings, and= =20 that we are more clear concerning eachothers standpoints now. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Researcher Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --Boundary-02=_HPGF/Ji4a2jhlRJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/FGPHbKx5DBjWFdsRAsevAJ4nk+xj2ZxlZS3zfJr2Q718wJqGnACghrju kPKoeljB/DXIyN4nQWTGqmE= =gcKV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_HPGF/Ji4a2jhlRJ--