Re: [gentoo-dev] app-cvs

[Dan Armak <danarmak@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1030 bytes --]

On Monday 14 July 2003 11:25, Tal Peer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While discussing the state of the php-cvs package on #gentoo_dev, lu_zero
> suggested that we open a new category 'app-cvs' and move all -cvs packages
> there. That way we don't litter all the categories with -cvs ebuilds that
> most of users don't need/want.

I don't like this idea. As others have said here, it defeats the purpose of 
categories as app groups. Also, there are many ebuilds most users don't need/
want, but I wouldn't define them as litter. I don't see that -cvs ebuilds in 
various categories interfere with users in any way, and they make it easy to 
see which packages have -cvs counterparts and which only have -cvs versions, 
since they are listed together.

Finally, some of us write cvs ebuilds that don't have -cvs extensions :-)

-- 
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Matan, Israel
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD  0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]