From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19174 invoked by uid 1002); 15 Jul 2003 04:58:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8944 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2003 04:58:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:01:44 -0400 From: Brad Cowan To: ralphdewitt@charter.net Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030715010144.4a6a0adc.bcowan@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200307142137.29419.ralphdewitt@charter.net> References: <20030714214621.33b75fbd.zhen@gentoo.org> <20030714220238.B12388@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> <20030714234033.2ddc5ea9.bcowan@gentoo.org> <200307142137.29419.ralphdewitt@charter.net> Organization: www.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo part II. X-Archives-Salt: bd1e6e79-6d20-43ff-b72a-d5338bc7d599 X-Archives-Hash: e55695eb59ae650ef84126316bfc2d58 My post wasn't to agree or disagree with the proposal, it was intended to stifle the personal attacks/flamage/whatnot and improve the overall quality of posts. Well thought out posts/ideas deserve well thought out intelligent answers no matter how you feel one way or the other towards the subject or even how stupid a subject is. It's a respect thing. Anyway that's my 2 cents. -- Brad Cowan Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~bcowan Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB1F16A56 Key fingerprint = C408 75B9 E68D 26E2 EAAE 20CF 4D5E 293D B1F1 6A56 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list