From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17181 invoked by uid 1002); 15 Jul 2003 03:36:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 6962 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2003 03:36:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:40:33 -0400 From: Brad Cowan To: splite Cc: gentoo-core@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030714234033.2ddc5ea9.bcowan@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030714220238.B12388@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> References: <20030714214621.33b75fbd.zhen@gentoo.org> <20030714220238.B12388@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> Organization: www.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo part II. X-Archives-Salt: 44cb6b8e-9790-49cd-b21b-eeeeed7ca085 X-Archives-Hash: 650fbba59f603b02bd954fea18839383 On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 22:02:38 -0500 splite wrote: In regards to your reply, I think it shows quite a bit of ignorance. The next time why don't you show a little respect, even some tact to someone else's well thought out and worded proposals and ideas. You might end up getting some respect for yourself, but you have gained none by me with that post. -- Brad Cowan Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~bcowan Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB1F16A56 Key fingerprint = C408 75B9 E68D 26E2 EAAE 20CF 4D5E 293D B1F1 6A56 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list