From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9223 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Jul 2003 01:00:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7150 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2003 01:00:20 -0000 From: Jay Pfeifer To: Grant Goodyear Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:00:05 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: gentoo-core@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1058140112.32010.70.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1058140112.32010.70.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307132000.16517.pfeifer@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (----) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *19brhS-0007Rp-00*oG/9FvCKtFY* Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Ombudsman GLEP, second pass X-Archives-Salt: ae55c5bf-52ad-415f-b292-9f2139e90dba X-Archives-Hash: 35a2cf37f6ea34c00693fe2ccbd6f9d3 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 OK - I see the ombudsman as being valuable to our project. However, since t= he=20 persons acting as an ombudsman do not truly have authority for resolving th= e=20 issue @ hand and are just working as a mediator (not arbiter) to impartiall= y=20 investigate and potentially by wisdom settle disputes - I suggest we append= =20 the glep to state issues that cannot be resolved by using an ombudsman be=20 lifted to the tlps for direction on how to proceed. Then we as tlps can mak= e=20 a decision. While I do not see this as a frequent happening (becoming some= =20 burden to the tlps), ultimately someone has to be accountable and make a=20 decision when something cannot be handled by the ombudsman for whatever=20 sundry reason. Jay On Sunday 13 July 2003 06:48 pm, Grant Goodyear wrote: > Okay, It's been about a week since I sent my Ombudsman GLEP out for > comments, so it's time to summarize the comments so far. The original > GLEP may be found at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep. So far there =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/EgCce5xY3v0FhjgRAti9AJ4z3wd5GEBcz6Se90wCw+kDeIXfQwCfbiIf vULqL1+mijrqPBtvMXBYQ8E=3D =3Dk675 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list