From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29486 invoked by uid 1002); 12 Jul 2003 15:22:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14513 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2003 15:22:49 -0000 From: Peter Ruskin Organization: Retired To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 16:22:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <1057999358.30632.25.camel@mcvaio.liquidx.net> <20030712122508.33796f7d.spider@gentoo.org> <1058021393.31354.65.camel@mcvaio.liquidx.net> In-Reply-To: <1058021393.31354.65.camel@mcvaio.liquidx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307121622.48112.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] *-doc vs USE="doc" X-Archives-Salt: d6a68b18-899a-406d-bd98-e202d5640b04 X-Archives-Hash: 88fc0969cb850ced9ddf98f38a66ad2e On Saturday 12 Jul 2003 15:49, Alastair Tse wrote: > That seems reasonable. I just want clarify how we should handle docs. > I guess this is acceptable way. Just wondering why the docs aren't > actually included in the package themselves. Sometimes the sources are different. Please see Bug #24335 for an example of API docs and tutorials depending on the doc flag. Peter -- ================================================== Gentoo Linux: Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.8p1 kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ ================================================== -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list