From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8895 invoked by uid 1002); 11 Jul 2003 09:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 2744 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2003 09:16:12 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:16:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <873cheefw9.fsf@kirk.better-com.de> <874r1ujqcb.fsf@kirk.better-com.de> <20030711054058.GA8055@zaphod.anachem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> In-Reply-To: <20030711054058.GA8055@zaphod.anachem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_bBoD//fEG0QJLzU"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200307111116.11205.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How to fix pathnames in .ebuilds X-Archives-Salt: 597c6da8-8411-4ce6-8330-5e32cfc948e2 X-Archives-Hash: 7b3d48a271bc7ce46357c7037e556552 --Boundary-02=_bBoD//fEG0QJLzU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 11 July 2003 07:40, Patrick Kursawe wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Martin Lesser wrote: > > Before reporting this ebuild to bugs.gentoo.org I would like to know how > > long the "normal" period is between reporting a new ebuild and finding > > this ebuild in the portage tree (or getting any other response)- another > > ebuild was added on 05/31/03 > > (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22000) but since then not much > > happened... > > I'm afraid there is nothing like a "normal" period. It depends on quite > a few factors... for example, if a developer is interested in the program, > if he thinks he will be able to maintain it, how clean the ebuild looks, > air pressure, moon phase... > > > IMO creating or reporting ebuilds which perhaps are only helpful here > > doesn't make much sense. > > Perhaps someone else who needs it will find it when searching > bugs.gentoo.org for it. Try to see it as a "user contributed ebuilds" > database aswell. Also, ebuilds that go to big projects as kde and gnome will probably take m= ore=20 time. There are very many kde and gnome programs with various functions. Th= e=20 herds project aims to divide those to more projects, so that a kde sound=20 editor will go to the sound project, not to kde. That should help things as= =20 the members of the kde and gnome projects do not use every kind of program= =20 themselves. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Researcher Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl Homepage: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv --Boundary-02=_bBoD//fEG0QJLzU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/DoBbbKx5DBjWFdsRAu/hAJ9XzAf9RGUUwVnos2WVsnD4ksK08wCfbAta 6v6iuWfh/UfVlbrtuzJF+xM= =++4m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_bBoD//fEG0QJLzU--