On Friday 11 July 2003 13:09, Alex Veber wrote:
> On Friday 11 July 2003 05:28, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > Instead of virtual/wine, perhaps virtual/win32 would be better? After
> > all, Gentoo Windows (aka Gentoo Cygwin) would probably use the actual
> > Win32 libraries and not a WINE...
>
> I honesly don't know anything about cygwin or how it works, but the main
> reason of intreducing the wine virtual is so that apps can compile and link
> against winelib. together with the wine-config tool I am working on will
> enable users to link against diffrent versions of wine without a problem.
>

I agree, a virtual/win32 will probably not work. Most applications that want 
wine expect the wine environment. They don't expect actual windows. Of 
course, in case we have a win32 port the wine dependency can be made 
dependent on that (!win32? (virtual/wine) )

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv