From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21912 invoked by uid 1002); 11 Jul 2003 08:06:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5916 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2003 08:06:57 -0000 From: Alex Veber To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:09:27 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 References: <200307092027.53059.coronalvr@gentoo.org> <20030710023330.GD28875@time> <200307110528.20093.luke-jr@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200307110528.20093.luke-jr@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="shift_jis" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200307111109.33920.coronalvr@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Creation of 'virtual/wine' to satisfy builds X-Archives-Salt: 9d283b8b-3b41-4b92-af01-aac242a778e6 X-Archives-Hash: fd9720be452965784ae81764daf66392 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 July 2003 05:28, Luke-Jr wrote: > Instead of virtual/wine, perhaps virtual/win32 would be better? After all, > Gentoo Windows (aka Gentoo Cygwin) would probably use the actual Win32 > libraries and not a WINE... I honesly don't know anything about cygwin or how it works, but the main=20 reason of intreducing the wine virtual is so that apps can compile and link= =20 against winelib. together with the wine-config tool I am working on will=20 enable users to link against diffrent versions of wine without a problem. =2D --=20 Alex Veber Developer Gentoo Linux =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Dprr0Q5UUdinJT4RAmOxAJ9NSE3Uk2s7GWa3Ep74MntfeANKUQCcDQY5 XibG5yaA287hXpnnpOBaz3o=3D =3DZxme =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list