From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19896 invoked by uid 1002); 11 Jul 2003 05:41:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25969 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2003 05:40:59 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 07:40:58 +0200 From: Patrick Kursawe To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030711054058.GA8055@zaphod.anachem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> Mail-Followup-To: Patrick Kursawe , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <873cheefw9.fsf@kirk.better-com.de> <1057841073.2127.2.camel@localhost> <1057840805.8047.10.camel@huggins.eng.cam.ac.uk> <874r1ujqcb.fsf@kirk.better-com.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874r1ujqcb.fsf@kirk.better-com.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How to fix pathnames in .ebuilds X-Archives-Salt: f90899aa-23b5-45a4-a9b1-a180f708f532 X-Archives-Hash: 2f9552038c4aea746c5ed11c28e5f5e3 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Martin Lesser wrote: > Before reporting this ebuild to bugs.gentoo.org I would like to know how > long the "normal" period is between reporting a new ebuild and finding > this ebuild in the portage tree (or getting any other response)- another > ebuild was added on 05/31/03 > (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22000) but since then not much > happened... I'm afraid there is nothing like a "normal" period. It depends on quite a few factors... for example, if a developer is interested in the program, if he thinks he will be able to maintain it, how clean the ebuild looks, air pressure, moon phase...=09 > IMO creating or reporting ebuilds which perhaps are only helpful here > doesn't make much sense. Perhaps someone else who needs it will find it when searching bugs.gentoo.org for it. Try to see it as a "user contributed ebuilds" database aswell. Bye, Patrick --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Dk3qbfJVn0GlZw8RAp9xAKCQGiGeiPuYVDpr34FkJiNP0yb8JACgqURc sfwmgWY+qjqia5Q0vCiUMyY= =u0Kt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--