From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26103 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Jul 2003 11:55:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12556 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2003 11:55:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 07:55:35 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-core@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev Message-ID: <20030710115534.GG28875@time> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-core@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev References: <3F0C4A20.9030704@gentoo.org> <20030710022845.GA28875@time> <20030710103243.67a480b6.spider@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030710103243.67a480b6.spider@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Creation of 'virtual/vi' to satisfy builds X-Archives-Salt: 4c1e39ed-2588-47cf-b9fc-7b754fdba825 X-Archives-Hash: e4be563c2df8a95f637ce6485758cdc3 Spider wrote: [Thu Jul 10 2003, 04:32:43AM EDT] > classic vi do that as well. Hehe, that one didn't turn up with "ls -d */?vi*" (of course). There's also elvis and vile. I guess there's quite a few that would satisfy virtual/ex, but I'm still hesitant to add it for a single questionable build. Dubiously yours, Aron -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list