From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16401 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Jul 2003 11:52:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25586 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2003 11:52:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 07:51:59 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-core@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030710115157.GF28875@time> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-core@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <3F0C4A20.9030704@gentoo.org> <20030710022845.GA28875@time> <3F0CD23C.3010808@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F0CD23C.3010808@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Creation of 'virtual/vi' to satisfy builds X-Archives-Salt: ed77a619-2e8c-424c-9357-b8a1ac7d7dca X-Archives-Hash: c8d64c16a2ebddd2655314cfe18e3b83 Brad Laue wrote: [Wed Jul 09 2003, 10:41:00PM EDT] > A Makefile generation script within the mozilla build required it, but > I decided adding two dependencies just to make a Makefile which isn't > specific to the user's system was overcomplicating matters. > > Also, I noticed earlier the presence of virtual/editor, which nvi/vim > can satisfy, so I don't know how much utility virtual/ex will serve... Are you saying that you're no longer pursuing virtual/ex? Aron -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list