[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Creation of 'virtual/vi' to satisfy builds

[Spider <spider@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1162 bytes --]

begin  quote
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 22:28:46 -0400
Aron Griffis <agriffis@gentoo.org> wrote:



> 1. Does having a virtual require that only one of the options is
>    installed at a time?  I recall this being the case with
>    ssmtp/postfix/etc, but maybe that's specific to those ebuilds.
>    I wouldn't want Gentoo to be restricted to a single vi-clone on a
>    system.

No , those builds also -conflict- with the virtual, to prevent any other
thing that satisfies said virtual from working.



> 
> 3. What about the case where you install vim, then install nvi, then
>    uninstall nvi?  In that case /usr/bin/ex will disappear from the
>    system (because the files conflict between packages), but the
>    virtual will still be "satisfied".

This is a hairy issue which probably should be fixed within portage
(sanity check of some sort??  check target of symlinks perhaps?)

> 
> 4. What are the ebuilds that provide ex?  At first glance, I only see
>    nvi and vim.

classic vi do that as well.

//Spider

-- 
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]