From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25218 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Jul 2003 02:33:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29598 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2003 02:33:33 -0000 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 22:33:31 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030710023330.GD28875@time> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200307092027.53059.coronalvr@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307092027.53059.coronalvr@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Creation of 'virtual/wine' to satisfy builds X-Archives-Salt: bbd43400-43d0-44c8-b253-16fcdc29d45b X-Archives-Hash: 2b46d8db811012c345cf709aec793564 Alex Veber wrote: [Wed Jul 09 2003, 04:27:41PM EDT] > currently Gentoo provides wine, winex, winex-cvs and nwwine, 4 > diffrent versions of wine. because some apps depend/will depend on > wine to work and even to compile, I would like to propose the creation > of virtual/wine. Are they really equivalent to the wine drinkers? For example, the providers of virtual/smtp are equivalent programs to all the programs requiring /usr/lib/sendmail to exist. Are the consumers of wine ambivalent to which vintage is installed? Aron -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list