public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aron Griffis <agriffis@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-core@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Creation of 'virtual/vi' to satisfy builds
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 22:28:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030710022845.GA28875@time> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F0C4A20.9030704@gentoo.org>

Brad Laue wrote:	[Wed Jul 09 2003, 01:00:16PM EDT]
> I'm running into builds requiring the 'ex' binary, which is provided
> by several vi clones.
> 
> I'd like to suggest the creation of 'virtual/vi' to satisfy this 
> problem. Are there any comments/objections?

In principle, I don't have a problem with this, but I have a couple
questions:

1. Does having a virtual require that only one of the options is
   installed at a time?  I recall this being the case with
   ssmtp/postfix/etc, but maybe that's specific to those ebuilds.
   I wouldn't want Gentoo to be restricted to a single vi-clone on a
   system.

2. What are the builds that require ex?  That's a pretty strange
   requirement, to be honest.  Most builds I've seen require ed for
   non-interactive editing, not ex.

3. What about the case where you install vim, then install nvi, then
   uninstall nvi?  In that case /usr/bin/ex will disappear from the
   system (because the files conflict between packages), but the virtual
   will still be "satisfied".

4. What are the ebuilds that provide ex?  At first glance, I only see
   nvi and vim.

Aron

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-10  2:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3F0C4A20.9030704@gentoo.org>
     [not found] ` <20030709215856.GB19946@inventor.gentoo.org>
2003-07-09 22:33   ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Creation of 'virtual/vi' to satisfy builds Spider
2003-07-10  2:28 ` Aron Griffis [this message]
2003-07-10  3:17   ` Brad Laue
2003-07-10  8:32   ` Spider
2003-07-10 11:55     ` Aron Griffis
2003-07-10 16:18       ` Spider
     [not found]   ` <3F0CD23C.3010808@gentoo.org>
2003-07-10 11:51     ` Aron Griffis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030710022845.GA28875@time \
    --to=agriffis@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-core@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox