From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-4416-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 31389 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Jul 2003 00:55:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 24316 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2003 00:54:51 -0000
From: Norberto BENSA <nbensa@gmx.net>
Reply-To: nbensa@yahoo.com
Organization: BENSA.ar
To: rob holland <robh@gentoo.org>, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 18:27:36 -0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
References: <20030707213654.1a908d36.florian.huber@mnet-online.de> <20030708102953.176cf668.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net> <167050000.1057686001@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <167050000.1057686001@localhost>
X-Operating-System: Gentoo GNU/Linux 1.4
X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x49664BBE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_KdzC/j0sW89hVq/";
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200307081827.38935.nbensa@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [FEATURE-REQUEST][PORTAGE] Apply custom patches
X-Archives-Salt: 5ed6cd03-518c-47d1-957c-2a7d7b02867d
X-Archives-Hash: 218d9951800021a8c76744a8d0a44d73

--Boundary-02=_KdzC/j0sW89hVq/
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

nbensa@venkman ~ $ date ; echo ${rob holland}
Tuesday 08 July 2003 02:40 pm

> --On Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:29:53 -0700 "C. Brewer"
>
> <cbrewer@stealthaccess.net> wrote:
> > For that kind of effort, it would be far easier to edit the ebuild
> > directly. I think you'd be surprised that on a ~x86 box the number of
> > patches that need to be added, or better yet, taken out as they are not
> > needed or break the package under certain circumstances, not to mention
> > the amount of patches that are included with some ebuilds as a sweeping
> > general purpose one-size fits all patching.
>
> How would MY_PATCHES allow you to not apply a patch?
>
> MY_PATCHES=3D"-notthisone.patch"?
>

I'm not sure I understand your statement. What are you trying to say?

MY_PATCHES is a variable and IF is NOT defined, then there're no patches to=
=20
apply. What's the problem?

Norberto

--Boundary-02=_KdzC/j0sW89hVq/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/CzdKFXVF50lmS74RAvSYAJ4g59PQ08e+0q/Mow73mo4rL6tBWQCbB2p6
k6tNQk9wel3YF+KBa0nVzEY=
=t2Ix
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_KdzC/j0sW89hVq/--