From: Patrick Kursawe <phosphan@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Directory services (was Re: [gentoo-dev] maybe it is time to put portage queries into a database.)
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:27:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030627152741.GA15138@zaphod.anachem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030627152102.GC1717@pbook.polysynx.foo>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 860 bytes --]
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 05:21:02PM +0200, c.wegener@itcampus.de wrote:
[portage in LDAP]
> As directory services are optimized for read performance, there are
> disadvantages for write access to a directory service. But compared to
> the amount of user needing read access to a directory service the
> number of write access updates should REALLY small.
>
> I think your bad experience with LDAP as authentication service may
> have to do with misconfiguration or lack of optimization.
I wonder how LDAP should have a better performance than rsync?
Are there implementations that support compression while transmitting
only the delta between entries?
I have next to no experience with directory services, so could you
please outline a bit further why you think this is better than rsync
or a database?
Yours sceptically,
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-27 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-24 22:00 [gentoo-dev] maybe it is time to put portage queries into a database Tony Clark
2003-06-24 22:16 ` jesse
2003-06-24 22:36 ` Tony Clark
2003-06-25 6:30 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-06-24 22:52 ` Julien Herfurth
2003-06-24 22:36 ` Henti Smith
2003-06-24 23:04 ` jesse
2003-06-24 22:58 ` Henti Smith
2003-06-24 23:57 ` Brian Jackson
2003-06-25 3:05 ` Tony Clark
2003-06-25 3:37 ` jesse
2003-06-24 23:04 ` Tony Clark
2003-06-27 2:03 ` Mark Bainter
2003-06-27 6:45 ` Eric Sammer
2003-06-27 12:23 ` [gentoo-dev] Directory services (was Re: [gentoo-dev] maybe it is time to put portage queries into a database.) Eric Sammer
2003-06-27 12:58 ` Rigo Ketelings
2003-06-27 14:58 ` Zack Gilburd
2003-06-27 15:21 ` c.wegener
2003-06-27 15:27 ` Patrick Kursawe [this message]
2003-06-27 15:38 ` Eric Sammer
2003-06-27 15:28 ` Eric Sammer
2003-06-27 15:32 ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-06-27 15:41 ` Eric Sammer
2003-06-27 19:38 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-06-24 22:16 ` [gentoo-dev] maybe it is time to put portage queries into a database Brian Jackson
2003-06-24 22:41 ` Tony Clark
2003-06-24 22:41 ` Marius Mauch
2003-06-24 23:14 ` kl4rk
2003-06-25 2:20 ` jesse
2003-06-25 4:08 ` Matthew Kennedy
2003-06-25 10:39 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-06-25 11:01 ` kl4rk
2003-06-25 11:57 ` rob holland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030627152741.GA15138@zaphod.anachem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
--to=phosphan@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox