From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@gg3.net>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Weekly News Letter - "Where is Gentoo Linux 1.4"
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 02:36:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030626173654.GA25468%chutz@gg3.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EFB2350.3010603@snerk.org>
On 26/06/2003 at 12:46:08(-0400), Stewart used 3.8K just to say:
> If an ebuild is, for whatever reason, broken enough to warrant a
> revision bump, does it really conpute to leave it in the tree while
> removing a perfectly viable, if only older build in its stead?
I couldn't agree more. A nice example would be bug #12844. I am still reluctant
of doing "emerge '>netscape-flash-6'"
--
/\ Georgi Georgiev /\ "...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known /\
\/ chutz@gg3.net \/ as the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly)." (By \/
/\ +81(90)6266-1163 /\ Matt Welsh) /\
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-26 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-23 6:22 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Weekly News Letter - "Where is Gentoo Linux 1.4" Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-06-23 6:43 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-06-23 23:28 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-24 0:58 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-24 10:16 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-24 12:08 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-06-24 23:26 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 0:29 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-24 17:18 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-24 23:27 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 0:30 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-25 4:22 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 4:19 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-25 4:49 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 4:53 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-25 5:12 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 5:15 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-25 10:07 ` rob holland
2003-06-25 11:22 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 11:31 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-06-25 11:57 ` Toby Dickenson
2003-06-25 13:18 ` rob holland
2003-06-25 14:08 ` Stuart Bouyer
2003-06-25 15:14 ` rob holland
2003-06-25 14:56 ` Stuart Bouyer
2003-06-25 19:01 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-06-25 21:38 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 23:13 ` jesse
2003-06-25 23:20 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-26 10:05 ` Toby Dickenson
2003-06-26 16:46 ` Stewart
2003-06-26 17:36 ` Georgi Georgiev [this message]
2003-06-27 0:28 ` Jonathan Kelly
2003-06-25 14:43 ` Seemant Kulleen
2003-06-25 14:55 ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-06-23 7:05 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-23 8:03 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-06-23 8:10 ` Michael Kohl
2003-06-23 8:32 ` Luke Graham
2003-06-23 8:46 ` [gentoo-dev] ALSA Ovidiu Ghinet
2003-06-23 11:22 ` Jon Ellis
2003-06-23 13:57 ` Ovidiu Ghinet
2003-06-23 17:14 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Weekly News Letter - "Where is Gentoo Linux 1.4" Jon Portnoy
2003-06-23 17:19 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-23 12:48 ` Svyatogor
2003-06-24 3:43 ` Stewart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030626173654.GA25468%chutz@gg3.net \
--to=chutz@gg3.net \
--cc=chutz-dated-1057858616.3abee8ee4675@gg3.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox