From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-4094-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 11745 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Jun 2003 12:37:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 17098 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2003 12:37:11 -0000
From: FRLinux <frlinux@frlinux.net>
Organization: The Evil Penguin
To: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>,
 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org,
 gentoo-core@gentoo.org
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:43:14 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
References: <3EFA47A7.5080608@gentoo.org> <20030626115612.GA3681@gonzo.peterjohanson.com> <20030626052852.1c3037fa.seemant@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030626052852.1c3037fa.seemant@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200306261343.14850.frlinux@frlinux.net>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] FORK: The Time Is Now
X-Archives-Salt: c55b2a27-02e8-4a7c-9f39-4c726f099b19
X-Archives-Hash: 1fff2c0d962c61070e33b66d5f9b1515

I strongly disagree, this should be left in the open so everybody can react 
and give his opinion on the matter. Going to a closed-list debate is not 
exactly what i call transparent ...

As someone mentionned before, people want answers about their work and the way 
Gentoo is going, the reasons for which he did the fork are his, but some of 
them are ours, as i know i'm not the only one wondering about those issues. 
Whilst i do agree with your point on the unnecessay mudfight, i think this 
thread should continue right here.

Steph

On Thursday 26 June 2003 13:28, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> This is going to -dev, but it's targetted mainly at the gentoo developers
> (no offense to anyone else, and your input is very much welcomed as well). 


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list