From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11745 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Jun 2003 12:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17098 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2003 12:37:11 -0000 From: FRLinux Organization: The Evil Penguin To: Seemant Kulleen , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, gentoo-core@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:43:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <3EFA47A7.5080608@gentoo.org> <20030626115612.GA3681@gonzo.peterjohanson.com> <20030626052852.1c3037fa.seemant@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030626052852.1c3037fa.seemant@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306261343.14850.frlinux@frlinux.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] FORK: The Time Is Now X-Archives-Salt: c55b2a27-02e8-4a7c-9f39-4c726f099b19 X-Archives-Hash: 1fff2c0d962c61070e33b66d5f9b1515 I strongly disagree, this should be left in the open so everybody can react and give his opinion on the matter. Going to a closed-list debate is not exactly what i call transparent ... As someone mentionned before, people want answers about their work and the way Gentoo is going, the reasons for which he did the fork are his, but some of them are ours, as i know i'm not the only one wondering about those issues. Whilst i do agree with your point on the unnecessay mudfight, i think this thread should continue right here. Steph On Thursday 26 June 2003 13:28, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > This is going to -dev, but it's targetted mainly at the gentoo developers > (no offense to anyone else, and your input is very much welcomed as well). -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list