From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25099 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Jun 2003 13:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21703 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2003 13:07:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:07:18 -0400 From: Michael Cummings To: FRLinux Cc: Seemant Kulleen , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, gentoo-core@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030626090718.B15322@datanode.net> References: <3EFA47A7.5080608@gentoo.org> <20030626115612.GA3681@gonzo.peterjohanson.com> <20030626052852.1c3037fa.seemant@gentoo.org> <200306261343.14850.frlinux@frlinux.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200306261343.14850.frlinux@frlinux.net>; from frlinux@frlinux.net on Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:43:14PM +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] FORK: The Time Is Now X-Archives-Salt: 4f8d9abc-538a-47b0-80fa-bfbb141c5bd8 X-Archives-Hash: 1ec68a8e175e9dc6210bcd6dab1eb216 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steph, No offense intended, but I believe you have misinterpreted Seemant's invitation. Seemant is asking folks, devs in particular since they are on the "front line" in many respects, what they consider to be issues/concerns with Gentoo. The offer to email privately is just in case you don't want to share your opinions with the group at large, but still want your voice heard. My understanding from talking with seemant on irc is that this is to see what others think are issues, either with the distribution, the tools, etc., so that we *can* address concesus voted issues. Think of it if you will as all of us sitting in a group meeting going around and listing our favorite colour, movie, and issues/concerns/ideas for gentoo ;). -mike, the quiet perl guy On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:43:14PM +0100, FRLinux wrote: > I strongly disagree, this should be left in the open so everybody can rea= ct=20 > and give his opinion on the matter. Going to a closed-list debate is not= =20 > exactly what i call transparent ... >=20 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE++vAGq1ztTp5/Ti4RAq0bAJ9qLacljs9qs+BHgcMH43S54+6zWACfR9bx aqmbPlBUEuLGbdkuHDxMb5Y= =/6wU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--