From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1840 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Jun 2003 22:02:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 554 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2003 22:02:18 -0000 From: Tony Clark To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:02:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <20030625013328.GA10762@inventor.gentoo.org> <20030625105855.7b9575d1.seemant@gentoo.org> <20030625190125.GB5667@cerberus.oppresses.us> In-Reply-To: <20030625190125.GB5667@cerberus.oppresses.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306260002.17704.tclark@telia.com> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Some testing X-Archives-Salt: 0b04dc9f-3b6b-4e9a-a6c0-843b06e99070 X-Archives-Hash: aee358d9e7b89f06ea5e63d6da568ff6 On Wednesday 25 June 2003 21.01, Jon Portnoy wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:58:55AM -0700, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > > foul language and high tempers -- this thread has degenerated. > > Indeed. I apologize to all -dev readers for contributing to that with > sarcastic comments. I'm short on patience lately. It's not a problem. It happens to everyone at times. > > As for clearly defined 1.4 goals, someone can repost them. > > Might be missing something, but off the top of my head... > > - genkernel (completed but needs further testing) Ok I was able to test this. Unfortunately it failed for me. I know I need to post a bug but that will have to wait till the morning. The basic problem is genkernel vanilla-sources --testing gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.21/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wn aphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferr k-boundary=2 -march=i386 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /usr/src/linux-2.4.21 e/linux/modversions.h -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=sim710 sim710.o sim710.c sim710.c: In function `sim710_driver_init': sim710.c:589: `A_msg_reject_used' undeclared (first use in this function) sim710.c:589: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once sim710.c:589: for each function it appears in.) sim710.c:591: `A_test1_src_used' undeclared (first use in this function) sim710.c:593: `A_test1_dst_used' undeclared (first use in this function) sim710.c: In function `sim710_detect': sim710.c:1580: `Ent_test1' undeclared (first use in this function) sim710.c:1613: `A_int_test1' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [sim710.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.21/drivers/scsi' make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_scsi] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.21/drivers' make: *** [_mod_drivers] Error 2 A couple of comments. The script doesn't source /etc/make.conf so it doesn't get march=athlon or make_opts="-j5" correct. Builds a march=i386 kernel. using -j1 doesn't see distcc. not sourcing /etc/make.conf maybe intential didn't build smp support. It doesn't check that the kernel source is alreay installed. tony -- Contract ASIC and FPGA design. Telephone +46 702 894 667 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x633E2623 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list