From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@gentoo.org>
To: Matt Thrailkill <xwred1@xwredwing.net>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Weekly News Letter - "Where is Gentoo Linux 1.4"
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:53:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030625045343.GA27897@cerberus.oppresses.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030624214904.4a08cefb.xwred1@xwredwing.net>
(Do you think you could fix word wrapping in your client? When reading
mails it doesn't matter, but it screws up quoting on replies... hence
this top-post)
We plan to have functionality to allow you to only merge security
updates. I don't know the status of this...
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:49:04PM -0700, Matt Thrailkill wrote:
> Has there been any talk of having an option to select a snapshot of the Portage tree to be pulled down during rsyncing? Or perhaps even forks of the tree to represent stable, unstable, this version, that version? I suppose the different profiles facilitate this somewhat, but it doesn't seem terribly granular.
>
> I think it'd be really great to be able to install Gentoo on a server box, and tell it "Keep the Portage tree locked to v1.4-Stable" and be confident that every time I update my world, I'm only getting critical bug and security fixes, that there is no risk of wildly different init scripts or config files coming down, or broken ebuilds, or silly snafu's of apps that suddenly don't work -- all of which seem to still occur even if I leave ACCEPT_KEYWORDS undefined.
>
> And then having that server locked to the specific release branch, I could rely on GRP packages rather than putting it under load when I need to install something, or at the least having to wait however long it may take to compile whatever it is. And I know that because I'm sticking to the stable tree, I'm running the stuff that the maintainers have beat on and tested and that the maintainers have confidence in the reliability and quality of what was put in that release.
>
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:19:56 -0400
> Jon Portnoy <avenj@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > You're correct. We use a snapshot of the tree to build stages. However,
> > stages have (relatively) few apps... most of them small.
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-25 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-23 6:22 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Weekly News Letter - "Where is Gentoo Linux 1.4" Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-06-23 6:43 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-06-23 23:28 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-24 0:58 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-24 10:16 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-24 12:08 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-06-24 23:26 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 0:29 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-24 17:18 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-24 23:27 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 0:30 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-25 4:22 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 4:19 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-25 4:49 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 4:53 ` Jon Portnoy [this message]
2003-06-25 5:12 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 5:15 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-25 10:07 ` rob holland
2003-06-25 11:22 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 11:31 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-06-25 11:57 ` Toby Dickenson
2003-06-25 13:18 ` rob holland
2003-06-25 14:08 ` Stuart Bouyer
2003-06-25 15:14 ` rob holland
2003-06-25 14:56 ` Stuart Bouyer
2003-06-25 19:01 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-06-25 21:38 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-25 23:13 ` jesse
2003-06-25 23:20 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-06-26 10:05 ` Toby Dickenson
2003-06-26 16:46 ` Stewart
2003-06-26 17:36 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-06-27 0:28 ` Jonathan Kelly
2003-06-25 14:43 ` Seemant Kulleen
2003-06-25 14:55 ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-06-23 7:05 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-23 8:03 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-06-23 8:10 ` Michael Kohl
2003-06-23 8:32 ` Luke Graham
2003-06-23 8:46 ` [gentoo-dev] ALSA Ovidiu Ghinet
2003-06-23 11:22 ` Jon Ellis
2003-06-23 13:57 ` Ovidiu Ghinet
2003-06-23 17:14 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Weekly News Letter - "Where is Gentoo Linux 1.4" Jon Portnoy
2003-06-23 17:19 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-06-23 12:48 ` Svyatogor
2003-06-24 3:43 ` Stewart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030625045343.GA27897@cerberus.oppresses.us \
--to=avenj@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=xwred1@xwredwing.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox