From: Michael Kohl <citizen428@cargal.org>
To: lafou@wanadoo.fr
Cc: Gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] volonteers for a gentoo admin tool (portage frontend)
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 22:07:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030622220740.69093532.citizen428@cargal.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1056288854.2350.23.camel@biproc>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1580 bytes --]
On 22 Jun 2003 15:34:14 +0200
Philippe Lafoucrière <lafou@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Now we have to define fonctionnalities of this new utility. I propose
> a basic select/install/deinstall utility for the first release.
Hm, actually I always considered package managment a rather low priority
for a tool like this or even a tool on it's own.
What I'd love to see is something to replace the clutter of tools
currently present (mirrorselect, ufed, the various -confifgs etc.) for
gentoo specific tasks in on single tool, "Emergency" (my first name
proposal), "gentoo-config" or whatever name we decide on.
Also the task of installing packages in a GUI is already covered by
several projects (for a console version you can use the scripts from
Optilude found on forums.gentoo.org), but something similar to
/stand/sysinstall is not present and besides our talking not in the
planning AFAIK.
So maybe a good point to start would be _new_ functionality like a GUI
for setting various settings in /etc/make.conf (portdir overlay,
features, rsync retries etc.) and then start working on integrating
functionality currently provided by the other tools.
I'm not even sure anymore if I want to see package managment included in
this unified tool, as from my point of view a full featured package
manager is a project worth it's on program. But regarding this I'm open
for argument and other people's opinion.
My 2 cents,
Michael
--
www.cargal.org
GnuPG-key-ID: 0x90CA09E3
Jabber-ID: citizen428 [at] cargal [dot] org
Registered Linux User #278726
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-22 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-22 13:34 [gentoo-dev] volonteers for a gentoo admin tool (portage frontend) Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-06-22 14:07 ` Michael Kohl [this message]
2003-06-22 17:22 ` Svyatogor
2003-06-22 14:45 ` Michael Kohl
2003-06-22 14:45 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-06-22 18:05 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2003-06-22 21:48 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-06-23 6:59 ` Michael Kohl
2003-06-23 8:05 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-06-22 15:18 ` Cabec2
2003-06-22 16:50 ` Svyatogor
2003-06-22 13:54 ` hanez
2003-06-22 14:13 ` Michael Kohl
2003-06-22 18:25 ` Taylor Christopher P
2003-06-23 14:13 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-06-23 20:58 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030622220740.69093532.citizen428@cargal.org \
--to=citizen428@cargal.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=lafou@wanadoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox