Re: [gentoo-dev] drobbins mass mark stable

[Alan <alan@ufies.org>]

> > of "amd64" fixes.  I'd like to be careful about a glibc
> > upgrade, so can someone confirm that all these changes are
> > intentional and correct?
> No, this was an accident. drobbins is currently fixing it.

There are a lot of other packages still marked as newly stable (saw this
email last night and figured I'd wait till morning), no glibc but things
like baselayout, fileutils, procpc, etc.  It looks like a couple of
packages in dev-perl (mod_perl, HTML-Mason) had their deps bumped to
apache2 as well, while the apache 2 package is still masked (I threw a
couple of lines into packages.mask so that an emerge -up world would
complete).  

Just wondering if things are still being worked on or not, and if I
should throw a bug report in about this and/or just let an emerge world
go with the new packages.

alan

-- 
Alan <alan@ufies.org> - http://arcterex.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"There are only 3 real sports: bull-fighting, car racing and mountain 
climbing. All the others are mere games."                -- Hemingway

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list