From: Michael Kohl <citizen428@cargal.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified tool for Gentoo specific tasks?
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:03:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030610230314.71f33827.citizen428@cargal.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030610164236.5de01e80.me@0x1337.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1725 bytes --]
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:42:36 +0200
Sven Blumenstein <me@0x1337.net> wrote:
> I agree with that. I did read about ufed and mirrorselect here on the
> mailing list first. It should at least get mentioned in the install
> docs and maybe also included on the LiveCD as it would have much use
> on installation.
Don't know about the LiveCD's, haven't tried one for quite a while. But
people not knowing about one or the other tool I encounter quite often.
> >And creative like I feel today I
> > already came up with a code name for this proposal, "Emergency". ;-)
> >
>
> Heh, I like that name ;)
Thanks.
> And the idea behind it sounds good aswell. But instead of adding
> another new package, I would add the above mentioned tools to
> app-admin/gentoolkit together with the frontend. That way you could
> use every programm standalone or use it from the "Emergency" menu.
Hm, that doesn't sound bad either. But sometimes I have the feeling that
gentoolkit is a collection of tools which don't have a place yet (like
etc-update moving to portage, epm becoming it's own package), but I
might as well be wrong on that.
> As for the programming part, in my opinion shell scripts with use of
> "dialog" for the GUI are a good option.
Afer looking at ufed's code I realised that it also uses dialog. But
it's written in Perl. And actually I think that giving the possibility
to write a plug-in for "Emergency" in a variety of languages makes it
more attractive. But still, nothing against the use of dialog (or
Xdialog[1] for a GTK version of "Emergency").
Michael
[1] http://www.chez.com/godefroy/
--
www.cargal.org
GnuPG-key-ID: 0x90CA09E3
Jabber-ID: citizen428 [at] cargal [dot] org
Registered Linux User #278726
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-10 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-10 8:45 [gentoo-dev] Unified tool for Gentoo specific tasks? Michael Kohl
2003-06-10 9:07 ` Michael Kohl
2003-06-10 9:54 ` Michael Kohl
2003-06-10 14:42 ` Sven Blumenstein
2003-06-10 15:03 ` Michael Kohl [this message]
2003-06-10 16:21 ` Robin H.Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030610230314.71f33827.citizen428@cargal.org \
--to=citizen428@cargal.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox