From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18949 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Jun 2003 19:50:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19325 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2003 19:50:55 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:50:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <1055067141.13370.109.camel@simple> <20030608194535.GA548@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> In-Reply-To: <20030608194535.GA548@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_cO54+B+RzwFGInl"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200306082150.52849.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] apache.eclass proposed X-Archives-Salt: 4381b4f6-362e-424b-9aac-049bd0d6df6d X-Archives-Hash: aac4e2902d81de9d2463b4292e4bbb83 --Boundary-02=_cO54+B+RzwFGInl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 08 June 2003 21:45, Robin H.Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 06:12:21AM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > > After writing a net-www/ ebuild it seemed apparent to me that we are > > going to need an apache.eclass. A quick find in portage reveals quite a > > few independent ebuilds all needing the basic functionality that could > > be provided by an apache.eclass > > I agree that having this would be worthwhile, however it has been said > higher up before that /home/httpd/htdocs would be where things were > installed. > > > syntactically perfect the idea is what matters.. > > I have attached an apache.eclass that I welcome your input/feedback on. > > While it may not be syntactically perfect for the apache2 part its the > > idea that we get this out there and start talking about one that > > matters. > > A few problems with this. > 1. What about people that have both installed? I actually have an open > bug for mod_php about this, and I'm trying to decide on a workable > solution. Presently I'm leaning towards an enviroment variable > 'FORCE_APACHE=3D1|2' that overrides any detection routines, for the > special case of people that have both. This is what the apache2 use variable is supposed to do. At least, as far a= s I=20 know. > > 2. All of the functions start misbehaving when you have multiple > instances of the User/Group/DocumentRoot configuration directives. > > 3. The 'newdepend virtual/glibc sys-apps/gawk sys-apps/grep' > is questionable. > newdepend is definately correct for the apache install, > however the others shouldn't be required at runtime. I agree with both points. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Researcher Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --Boundary-02=_cO54+B+RzwFGInl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+45OcbKx5DBjWFdsRAoC7AJ9T0SS7C4r6Wt5JPLVPvuxodNxnYQCfcWQW lqqb41VbFbZewqxTGz6dACU= =nEz8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_cO54+B+RzwFGInl--