From: Robin H.Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
To: Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] apache.eclass proposed
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 12:45:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030608194535.GA548@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1055067141.13370.109.camel@simple>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1649 bytes --]
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 06:12:21AM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> After writing a net-www/ ebuild it seemed apparent to me that we are
> going to need an apache.eclass. A quick find in portage reveals quite a
> few independent ebuilds all needing the basic functionality that could
> be provided by an apache.eclass
I agree that having this would be worthwhile, however it has been said
higher up before that /home/httpd/htdocs would be where things were
installed.
> syntactically perfect the idea is what matters..
> I have attached an apache.eclass that I welcome your input/feedback on.
> While it may not be syntactically perfect for the apache2 part its the
> idea that we get this out there and start talking about one that
> matters.
A few problems with this.
1. What about people that have both installed? I actually have an open
bug for mod_php about this, and I'm trying to decide on a workable
solution. Presently I'm leaning towards an enviroment variable
'FORCE_APACHE=1|2' that overrides any detection routines, for the
special case of people that have both.
2. All of the functions start misbehaving when you have multiple
instances of the User/Group/DocumentRoot configuration directives.
3. The 'newdepend virtual/glibc sys-apps/gawk sys-apps/grep'
is questionable.
newdepend is definately correct for the apache install,
however the others shouldn't be required at runtime.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2@orbis-terrarum.net
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-08 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-08 10:12 [gentoo-dev] apache.eclass proposed Ned Ludd
2003-06-08 19:45 ` Robin H.Johnson [this message]
2003-06-08 19:50 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-06-09 3:07 ` Ned Ludd
2003-06-09 6:01 ` Robin H.Johnson
2003-06-09 17:23 ` Brad Laue
2003-06-10 3:02 ` Donny Davies
2003-06-10 5:43 ` Robin H.Johnson
2003-06-12 0:13 ` Stewart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-08 14:32 Joshua Brindle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030608194535.GA548@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net \
--to=robbat2@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=solar@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox