From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12627 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Jun 2003 22:34:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21437 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2003 22:34:46 -0000 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:34:40 -0400 From: Jon Portnoy To: Daniel Robbins Cc: Taylor Christopher P , Pieter Van den Abeele , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030603223440.GA18432@cerberus.oppresses.us> References: <20030603220739.GB30852@inventor.gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030603220739.GB30852@inventor.gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Ported to OS X X-Archives-Salt: 191f24eb-fb1e-4b36-adb6-69edda7baa68 X-Archives-Hash: baa5e0f2b37f0cfcfe5ff7c460f10e10 On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:07:39PM -0600, Daniel Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:42:34PM -0400, Taylor Christopher P wrote: > > when you say "open bug" whatcha mean? oh, and i need people to help me > > figure out somethings with the source... i remember vlad from my early > > gentoo-ppc days. i'll need to email them both... > > > > thanks! > > Probably best if I get Portage working initially under OS X. I've started > the port today and I'm not expecting that much difficulty -- should have it > mostly done some time today. We can officially support OS X and make this > into an official Gentoo project hosted on www.gentoo.org. :) > > Best Regards, > Are there licensing issues involved? Aren't there proprietary aspects to OS X that would prevent us from distributing it the usual way? -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list