On Wednesday 21 May 2003 05:35, Stephan Hermann wrote:
>
> I think you are misunderstanding.
>
> I'm not talking about ebuilds and gentoo software. I'm really talking about
> portage.
>
> Scenario:
>
> 	I want to build up a separate build server for own made profiles.
> 	I'm providing own ebuilds depending on self defined enviroments.
> 	I want to use portage, to manage different profiles.
>
> So, I have to move the portage python scripts from /usr/portage, the
> symlinks from /usr to somewhere else, and to redeclare all hardcoded path
> variables in the portage python source from e.g. /etc/make.conf to
> /opt/company_standard/portage_dist/etc/make.conf.
>
> I'm not talking about ebuilds, because I'm provinding my own set of
> ebuilds, specialised for several standard application enviroments.
>

Thanks for the clarification. I think that portage itself should be as 
location independent as possible ( one fixed location will be necessary to 
tell portage where to find the rest, but this location could be specified 
optionally by an environment variable). Allthough I'm not responsible for 
portage I encourage you to submit any patches to the extend of making portage 
even more location independent.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv