public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Hermann <sh@kde-coder.de>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] installing portage in another directory structure
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 05:35:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305210535.05426.sh@kde-coder.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200305202124.35043.pauldv@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1484 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tuesday 20 May 2003 21:24, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 May 2003 16:54, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > But I don't have a gentoo distribution as base linux.
> > Company standard is debian and we have a split between OS administration
> > and "application" administration.
> > (application in the meaning of: software to run self coded products for
> > customers)
> >
> > so I can't install the portage tree in /etc /usr/portage etc. I need to
> > install it at /opt/apps/portage for example.
>
> Unfortunately most ebuilds presume that they are build on a gentoo system,
> as such they have hardcoded directories. In general portage is not really
> that suitable as a secondary package manager.

I think you are misunderstanding.

I'm not talking about ebuilds and gentoo software. I'm really talking about 
portage.

Scenario:

	I want to build up a separate build server for own made profiles.
	I'm providing own ebuilds depending on self defined enviroments.
	I want to use portage, to manage different profiles.

So, I have to move the portage python scripts from /usr/portage, the symlinks 
from /usr to somewhere else, and to redeclare all hardcoded path variables in 
the portage python source from e.g. /etc/make.conf to 
/opt/company_standard/portage_dist/etc/make.conf.

I'm not talking about ebuilds, because I'm provinding my own set of ebuilds, 
specialised for several standard application enviroments.

regards,

\sh

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-21  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-20 14:35 [gentoo-dev] installing portage in another directory structure Stephan Hermann
2003-05-20 14:36 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-05-20 14:54   ` Stephan Hermann
2003-05-20 19:24     ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-05-20 20:30       ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-05-20 20:46         ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-05-20 21:15           ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-05-20 21:49           ` George Shapovalov
2003-05-21  0:22       ` Luke-Jr
2003-05-21  3:35       ` Stephan Hermann [this message]
2003-05-21  9:20         ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-05-21 11:55           ` Stephan Hermann
2003-05-20 15:09 ` Jack Morgan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200305210535.05426.sh@kde-coder.de \
    --to=sh@kde-coder.de \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox