From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20334 invoked by uid 1002); 20 May 2003 23:25:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 30548 invoked from network); 20 May 2003 23:25:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 01:25:41 +0200 From: Sylvain To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030521012541.60443fc6.asm8@wanadoo.fr> Organization: Meduse X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Operating-System: Linux From Scratch 3.0 (kernel 2.4.10) User-Agent: Sylpheed version 0.6.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [gentoo-dev] 2 uclibc questions : (un)masked / new use flag ? X-Archives-Salt: 2efbc1d7-749e-4fac-b733-c3e6346529c7 X-Archives-Hash: ea72269f32bcfa18a84750bf13d46a6e Hello ! My questions are in the title :-) 1) What about unmasking uclibc ebuild ? Did someone use it ? If so, are you happy with it, so that it would be possible to unmask it. I didn't find anything related to it on bugs.gentoo, and very few topics in forums. 2) Maybe i should submit a bug for that, but i first want to know if i'm the only person interested in that : i speak about a uclibc use flag. Packages in particular which could benefit from that are of course busybox, but also udhcp, and maybe others ? A package using this flag would change the PATH variable to /usr/i386-linux-uclibc/usr/bin/:$PATH in the environnement of econf and emake function. Waiting for comments :-) regards, sylvain -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list