[gentoo-dev] 2 uclibc questions : (un)masked / new use flag ?

[Sylvain <asm8@wanadoo.fr>]

Hello !

My questions are in the title :-)

1) What about unmasking uclibc ebuild ? Did someone use it ? If so,
   are you happy with it, so that it would be possible to unmask it.
   I didn't find anything related to it on bugs.gentoo, and very few topics
   in forums.

2) Maybe i should submit a bug for that, but i first want to know if i'm
   the only person interested in that : i speak about a uclibc use flag.
   Packages in particular which could benefit from that are of course busybox,
   but also udhcp, and maybe others ?
   A package using this flag would change the PATH variable to 
   /usr/i386-linux-uclibc/usr/bin/:$PATH in the environnement of econf and
   emake function.

Waiting for comments :-)

regards,

sylvain

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list