From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1527 invoked by uid 1002); 21 May 2003 00:22:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7152 invoked from network); 21 May 2003 00:22:58 -0000 From: Luke-Jr Organization: Gentoo Linux To: Paul de Vrieze , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 00:22:55 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200305201635.57663.sh@kde-coder.de> <200305201654.22974.sh@kde-coder.de> <200305202124.35043.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200305202124.35043.pauldv@gentoo.org> GPG-Public-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD53E9583 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="euc-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305210023.00205.luke-jr@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] installing portage in another directory structure X-Archives-Salt: d6816071-2f9f-4961-83b8-08541c12ee95 X-Archives-Hash: 23e97fbbcb129ba0d8524bf544ca420d =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Last I checked, the directories used by Portage can be changed in make.conf= =20 easilly... It works fine for me using /home/luke-jr/src/gentoo-x86/ for the= =20 Portage tree, at least... On Tuesday 20 May 2003 07:24 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2003 16:54, Stephan Hermann wrote: > > But I don't have a gentoo distribution as base linux. > > Company standard is debian and we have a split between OS administration > > and "application" administration. > > (application in the meaning of: software to run self coded products for > > customers) > > > > so I can't install the portage tree in /etc /usr/portage etc. I need to > > install it at /opt/apps/portage for example. > > Unfortunately most ebuilds presume that they are build on a gentoo system, > as such they have hardcoded directories. In general portage is not really > that suitable as a secondary package manager. > > Paul =2D --=20 Luke-Jr Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/ =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+ysbjZl/BHdU+lYMRAgh/AJsHQgmhr81mEngFAuueUDFvvHy8RQCeIgeZ tIW0DjWMEWDlP2uvCSbaDec=3D =3Dx+14 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list