From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30214 invoked by uid 1002); 20 May 2003 06:01:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4830 invoked from network); 20 May 2003 06:01:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 07:49:14 +0200 From: Henti Smith To: Daniel Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030520074914.26f84f4d.bain@tcsn.co.za> In-Reply-To: <200305200843.30774.dragonheart@tpg.com.au> References: <200305191109.56785.luke-jr@gentoo.org> <200305200843.30774.dragonheart@tpg.com.au> Organization: The Computer Smith Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xinetd X-Archives-Salt: 1c8ad18f-6403-4550-aa54-f52881918d65 X-Archives-Hash: 71ea02f20721c2bee125bceef245d85f On Tue, 20 May 2003 08:43:25 +0930 Daniel wrote: > > Just thinking it would be nice to have a xinetd USE flag which causes all > > daemons to configure themselves as xinetd services... Is there any reason > > why this would be a bad idea or why it doesn't exist? > > Sounds great to me. I run a lot of services that don't get used all that > often. When I get a bit more time I'll double check some of the scripts I've > written and add a few ebuilds. > > I'm assuming this is going to be a buy-in service like everything else in > gentoo. > > great idea, Just as long as it's a virtual USE flag so I can use tcpserver instead of xinetd ;P Henti -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list