[gentoo-dev] xinetd

[gentoo-dev] xinetd

[Luke-Jr]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just thinking it would be nice to have a xinetd USE flag which causes all 
daemons to configure themselves as xinetd services... Is there any reason why 
this would be a bad idea or why it doesn't exist?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+yLuCZl/BHdU+lYMRApmMAJ0f555wOWfV9J0vMxTMtwdJyStalgCeI6Sl
3r6JMlmAdkrg5WqtYWutrQg=
=gAS0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] xinetd

[Daniel]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 721 bytes --]


> Just thinking it would be nice to have a xinetd USE flag which causes all
> daemons to configure themselves as xinetd services... Is there any reason
> why this would be a bad idea or why it doesn't exist?

Sounds great to me. I run a lot of services that don't get used all that 
often. When I  get a bit more time I'll double check some of the scripts I've 
written and add a few ebuilds.

I'm assuming this is going to be a buy-in service like everything else in 
gentoo.

great idea,

Daniel
--
Proudly a Gentoo User.
GnuPG/PGP signed and encrypted email preferred
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x32A64DC8
Key fingerprint = 2300 3292 3351 9665 D41B DC20 4C34 9BB6 32A6 4DC8

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] xinetd

[Henti Smith]

On Tue, 20 May 2003 08:43:25 +0930
Daniel <dragonheart@tpg.com.au> wrote:

> > Just thinking it would be nice to have a xinetd USE flag which causes all
> > daemons to configure themselves as xinetd services... Is there any reason
> > why this would be a bad idea or why it doesn't exist?
> 
> Sounds great to me. I run a lot of services that don't get used all that 
> often. When I  get a bit more time I'll double check some of the scripts I've 
> written and add a few ebuilds.
> 
> I'm assuming this is going to be a buy-in service like everything else in 
> gentoo.
> 
> great idea,

Just as long as it's a virtual USE flag so I can use tcpserver instead of xinetd ;P 

Henti 

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list