From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29663 invoked by uid 1002); 17 May 2003 14:13:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 24583 invoked from network); 17 May 2003 14:13:54 -0000 From: Werner Van Belle Reply-To: werner.van.belle@vub.ac.be Organization: Vrije Universiteit Brussel To: Sven Vermeulen , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 16:13:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030517024911.GA6515@vaughan.foofalicious.com> <200305170833.33013.werner.van.belle@vub.ac.be> <20030517135716.GC2905@Daikan.pandora.be> In-Reply-To: <20030517135716.GC2905@Daikan.pandora.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305171613.44858.werner.van.belle@vub.ac.be> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] -fbranch-probabilities optimisation X-Archives-Salt: e960cf4e-58ae-4102-90a4-f5da793ff8de X-Archives-Hash: f592339b51f56838dfe82f0e242f6ec8 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 17 May 2003 15:57, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > Aah, then I'm completely in favor of adding this to Portage :) Maybe first investigate how good this thing works. I've done a quick check = and=20 I suspect this technique doesn't work on multithreaded programs.=20 Werner,- =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+xkOYxiU3uL/NdUYRAvq8AJ4gjvllvBdBgvF8/KxRyB1+cr/+TACgrSox II6ICeGh26ThhoWI/vOaFjM=3D =3DfDn9 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list