From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10285 invoked by uid 1002); 16 May 2003 00:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26860 invoked from network); 16 May 2003 00:20:39 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 02:20:31 +0200 From: Spider To: gentoo-dev Cc: azarah@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030516022031.57157e45.spider@gentoo.org> Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.LUn4.8oNGC1Zc=" Subject: [gentoo-dev] [WIP] gcc 3.3 X-Archives-Salt: 8a64da33-466d-4035-b3d9-5e45e093f5a3 X-Archives-Hash: cd28ed1c827d8a0d4d3a1462c0fe74ac --=.LUn4.8oNGC1Zc= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hi folks, here is an initial ebuild of gcc 3.3, it doesn't contain propolice patch, and I haven't checked it with "build" or other flags except the default. (its slow to build on this machine) The installationprocess has changed significantly, and now is actually far cleaner. I hope there aren't many snags with how this behaves on systems. I haven't yet looked at the thread patches, I hope somone who's more into this than I am can advice on that. Comments and testers are welcome :) //Spider -- begin .signature This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --=.LUn4.8oNGC1Zc= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+xC7UZS9CZTi033kRAi8zAKCjWqw8piaTcQaXJFtzCllGgtyvZwCeMDsK Z2GrDZ9ncVfcew6iR3pBw0A= =bw67 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.LUn4.8oNGC1Zc=--